Saturday, October 25, 2008

Rove-ing Evil’s Last Gasp - by Gerald Ollison




There is a scene in the movie Bladerunner which is as telling an image of evil in its death throws as has ever been portrayed.

The replicants, as they are called, are genetically created androids which are indistinguishable from humans in every way excepting one characteristic. They are completely devoid of an empathetic response. They don’t feel anything when other creatures are hurt. This is one apt definition of sociopathological evil.

In the last part of the movie one of the main female replicants, Pris, is shot by the protagonist and hits the ground kicking-n-screaming; but even this display is patently abnormal. It’s a lightning fast repetitive semi-mechanical impersonation of a child’s hate and frustration temper tantrum. It’s Pinocchio on steroids, on his back refusing to die; but it’s mechanical fishlike flopping, kicking and fist pounding betrays the fact that it’s never loved, let alone lived. It’s a frightening display which sends chills down the spine of anyone who has a spine and is paying attention.

The irony is you feel sorry for the creature; but you simultaneously realize there is no way in hell the creature feels the same about you or anything else (no more than a tractor or eggbeater). If you go a step further you also realize the creature believes your sympathetic response is your exploitable weakness. You think, “Oh God, please die, because if you get up there’ll be hell to pay and neither I nor any other sane person has that much currency”!

It’s a stunning display.

Ashley Todd, a McCain Campaign Volunteer is now facing potential charges because she faked a story that she was mugged by a black male at an ATM. She'd originally claimed her money was stolen and the attacker beat, kicked and, when the attacker noticed a sticker showing her support for McCain, carved a letter "B" on her cheek.

Michele Bachmann, Representative for the Sixth District in the State of Minnesota, has called for a press investigation to find out who in congress are pro or anti American, and is now rapidly backpedaling.

Robocalling runs rampant, accusing Obama of being soft on crime.

Both McCain and Palin, and ties to their campaigns, suggesting their competitors are associating with terrorists and is a Muslim (not that there’s anything wrong with that).

Effigies of a hanging black-Obama type; envelopes of white powder sent to democratic campaign offices; and the ole black-men-are-apes joke expressed with Curious George shirts and other paraphernalia; Fires set; shouts of “terrorist” and “kill him” from McCain/Palin campaign crowds, where we must assume the Secret Service is present and watching (but inconspicuously NOT doing their jobs by NOT trouncing on some ass, when this happened).

All of this... also a stunning display. And it doesn’t stop. The mechanical kicking and screaming only repeats... like a child’s temper tantrum.

I am a fan of a particular book by the late M. Scott Peck, M.D. His tomes are laced with Christian theology and psychology. Many of his critics believe the religion and psychiatry are too fluid in his works, often masquerading and otherwise confused with each other, and not in a productive and good way in their opinions. I was raised Christian, but am not certain I would fit that definition by anyone who knows that they are. What I am, is an (amateur) Jungian and as such I am interested in archetypes and anything remotely archetypal and, well, evil (and good too)... Evil and all of its historic personages and manifestations, well, that’s way up there... and this single book by Mister Peck is invoked repeatedly (and often not carefully enough) in relation to his proposed new view and psychological definition of a pathology. Because, in what may be his most compelling work, People of the Lie, this is what he posits:

“Be that as it may, the time is right, I believe, for psychiatry to recognize a distinct new type of personality disorder to encompass those I have named evil. In addition to the abrogation of responsibility that characterizes all personality disorders, this one would specifically be distinguished by:
(a) Consistent destructive, scapegoating behavior, which may often be quite subtle.
(b) Excessive, albeit usually covert, intolerance to criticism and other forms of narcissistic injury.
(c) Pronounced concern with public image and self-image of respectability, contributing to a stability of life-style but also to pretentiousness and denial of hateful feelings or vengeful motives.
(d) Intellectual deviousness, with an increased likelihood of a mild schizophreniclike disturbance of thinking at times of stress.”


He also mentions three other weaknesses: A self-centeredness which betrays a non-understanding of love; the second, since the scientific method is blatantly anti-narcissistic and anti-deception, a disdain and lack of understanding of science. The third quality observed of the evil and indeed, of Satan himself according to Peck, is, “... not only demonic brilliance but also extraordinary demonic stupidity.”

So evil is also, like a child... Well, it’s not too swift.

Many out there believe that this is just an antagonistic campaign strategy meant to incite a radical militant rightwing hateful crowd into a destructive fervor of harmful and perhaps murderous intent towards their critics, and even Obama himself. Some feel it’s a kind of endgame strategy. They know they’re going to lose, so they’re setting up an climate of criticism they can later point to, after an Obama administration shows it’s imperfections by not being instantaneously perfect, and say how they were right all along.

Some people even believe this is about conservatism versus liberalism; I’m with another crowd...

This will represent a generational change. In fact, many of the men who are now fighting this tide of change will actually physically, literally die off during the next 8 or more years of this sea change, as will their policies with them.

And this kicking and screaming. This uncreative, repetitious and mechanical flailing and finger pointing and hateful spewing are simply the best impersonation of a childish temper tantrum that a soulless and shattered android can muster...

It is not exactly the death knell of evil... because evil, or Satan, or an android can’t die...

But it is a reasonable facsimile I can live with.
Jerry'O
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © October 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved (Excepting the photos, maybe... My bad, Tee-hee...).

Friday, September 19, 2008

Deepak Chopra's Palin Effect


Originally posted at the Huffingtonpost.com; this is brilliant!


Obama and the Palin Effect
By Deepak Chopra

Posted September 4, 2008, HuffingtonPost.com


Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. This is perfectly illustrated by the rousing effect that Gov. Sarah Palin had on the Republican convention in Minneapolis this week. On the surface, she outdoes former Vice President Dan Quayle as an unlikely choice, given her negligent parochial expertise in the complex affairs of governing. Her state of Alaska has less than 700,000 residents, which reduces the job of governor to the scale of running one-tenth of New York City. By comparison, Rudy Giuliani is a towering international figure. Palin's pluck has been admired, and her forthrightness, but her real appeal goes deeper.

She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and exhorting people to obey their worst impulses. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of "the other." For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don't want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin's message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision.

Look at what she stands for:--Small town values -- a denial of America's global role, a return to petty, small-minded parochialism.--Ignorance of world affairs -- a repudiation of the need to repair America's image abroad.--Family values -- a code for walling out anybody who makes a claim for social justice. Such strangers, being outside the family, don't need to be heeded.--Rigid stands on guns and abortion -- a scornful repudiation that these issues can be negotiated with those who disagree.--Patriotism -- the usual fallback in a failed war.--"Reform" -- an italicized term, since in addition to cleaning out corruption and excessive spending, one also throws out anyone who doesn't fit your ideology.

Obama's call for higher ideals in politics can't be seen in a vacuum. The shadow is real; it was bound to respond. Not just conservatives possess a shadow -- we all do. So what comes next is a contest between the two forces of progress and inertia. Will the shadow win again, or has its furtive appeal become exhausted? No one can predict. The best thing about Gov. Palin is that she brought this conflict to light, which makes the upcoming debate honest. It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in. We deserve to see what we are getting, without disguise.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

My Midlife Job Crisis and the Elephant In the Room - by Gerald Ollison

I have been dealing with what, I guess, some call a midlife 'job' crisis. As a result, I've been dealing with a particularly unusual Jungian projection...

It's not like an Anima projection, which draws you towards a certain kind of woman over-n-over again, etc. Nothing so common. It's stranger than that, but just as haunting (and strangely humorous).

It's taken me almost two years to realize it had to do with my midlife crisis and 'Work' with a big 'W'; and I truly believe this has been responsible for keeping me unemployed. It's very bizarre... I described it recently to an old friend in an email, and I want to share it here too. I think this is probably quite common...

I worked for 7 years at a nonprofit classical radio station. I managed the membership and begged for money by mail, worked the membership database and the website... I did good by the station, literally raised millions (one 35 dollar donation at a time) for the station over a few years, and made a decent, modest living too; but the board changed, then the management changed... and we all tried to get along, but the 'law of two feet' was long overdue to be followed, so after many false starts I finally had to conclude it was time for me to leave that organization.

That was almost exactly 2 years ago... We've done a few odd jobs since then, but I've been slowly realizing that this new midlife thang I'm going through is plenty tough and, to me, a little mystical... And it's actually more than contributed to my inability to find to not only 'meaningful work', but any work at all. It has been strange... really...

I won't belabor the issue, but it is a story worth telling with a deep lesson to be learned. Simply put... I've noted I have issues to flesh out. We all have'em, and it's an old story-- around midlife you deal or you're dealt... In Robert Bly's Iron John he talks about katabasis or 'the rat's hole'... Well, I think I'm kinda there. But if I do the reflective work, I hope I understand correctly, and make a decision to go down the rat hole on my own, I'll be spared a more severe arrangement by the gods (an accident, illness, divorce or other tragedy) which will force me to look.

At first, I thought okay, I got skills and fundraising experience. I'll be able to get employment at another nonprofit within a couple of weeks... but that wasn't working, so then I thought it was my age, then my skin color, then the economy or some combination of all of the above... I tweaked and retweaked my résumé... Then after reading one career book after another, after then reading every self-help book and metaphysics tome in the universe, after vocational training to get my insurance sales license (so I can once again do the 'right thing' and just support family), after imploring the very universe itself with-- "The Seeeeeecret!"... after all of that... It began to slowly dawn on me that every time I did a job interview I was being sabotaged...

I don't mean self-sabotage with only verbal slips, etc. I don't mean self-fulfilling prophecy... I mean there was another Jungian something in the room with me...

I refer to it as "the elephant in the room"... but it's a little more than that. It's a Jungian presence made up of some combination of my issues. It's like entering a job interview with an invisible witchdoctor (like in the movie 'Beetlejuice'), who shakes a maraca and proceeds to tweak the results before I've barely started to speak...

The interviewer asks a question and I answer; the maraca shakes and the witchdoctor sings...

The other people in the interview don't exactly see me and my game face (no matter how good it is), or hear me... they see 'It' superimposed over me...It really is like my head is shrinking before their eyes or something!This witchdoctor is, well, really... another (unconscious) me... me and my (unconscious) dreams, spent or still present, my (unconscious) issues, my secret (unconscious) desires, my (unconscious) frustrations and defeats...

But this stuff I need to work on is 'unconscious' so it's particularly difficult to flesh out... Because this unconscious stuff is, by its very (unconscious) nature, unknowable! And there's not a goddamn thing I can do about it... except note it, work with it, work it all eventually and, ever so slowly, out...

There are exercises in books you can do, or which job counselors can help you with, which take you on a paths to finding new work...But a workbook and exercises mightn't work that well. They can tend to be too linear, which is attractive to your conscious mind; the unconscious abhors 'Linear'.

For instance, after being in theater forever, I thought that what I wanted to do (after using various workbooks) was still somehow closely related to something like theater. In particular, I was thinking events work and some kind of work with public speakers and the like... Logical, right? So logical, I even wrote executive summaries for business plans and designed brochures around this idea... I'm pretty sure that's not my path now... Working in a conference center might be an okay day job for me, but I know now that it isn't the expression my unconscious was yearning for.

Also understand, I do appreciate the difference between finding a job (in order to eat, pay the bills, etc.), and a vocation. I appreciate the difference quite well... Well... consciously, I do.
However, I'm not certain the subconscious makes, or is even capable of making, this same distinction...

So, after doing your exercises and workbooks, you might get that simple day job even, only to find it unfathomably unbearable on levels you can't even discern. Only feeling a generalized discomfort, and then eventually being fired or quitting. You will feel like you are going in circles... and you will... until the mystery is eventually truly solved... it actually may be more intuited at first, than discovered...

In fact, even when you're sure you've finally nailed the bugger down and brought it up to the splendid surface; you may find that you mightn't be able to do it for a living, but mostly as a hobby. What's important to know though, is that you've found not your living, but your reason to live; your 'expression'...

And after you've found this expression, and made a proclamation that you will pursue this path finally, then getting that day job gets easier, I think.

This has been my last 2 years. I really don't think this will turn out too bad. I really do believe I'm well on my own way by now, and I have done a lot of the head-work...

But, it has not been an easy 2 years with the witchdoctor.

Jerry'O

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © September 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.(Excepting the photos, maybe... My bad, Tee-hee...)

P.S. In fact, I'll share a book that's been particularly helpful for me, after reading it and working with it several times over (by the public pool where my 5 year old did his summer swim classes). It's called 'Living On Purpose', by Pat A Paulson, Sharon C. Brown and Jo Ann Wolf. It's the only workbook I've found which is nonlinear on purpose. This serves to speak to your subconscious a little better I think. After working with it for awhile I truly realized I was making some breakthroughs.

Friday, May 23, 2008

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #7: Hillary, the De-Energizer Bunny


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
----------------

Originally Posted March 30th (and she's still here...)

In light of recent statements from Clinton that she’ll be in the race ‘til the end, and in the face of odds that make her endorsement as a candidate numerically unlikely, a recent swath of endorsements seem to be sending back to her a reactionary message: First, Obama gets the endorsements from Gov. Bill Richardson, then Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey Jr., then most notably Vermont's Patrick Leahy...

And now on Saturday, Obama wins a majority in a second round, in Texas of all places, of delegates, putting him at 51 to her 49 percent there, and giving him an additional overall delegate lead of 1,858 to her 1,270.

This is more than a little ironic since she actually won the Texas primary; the popular vote...

It’s ironic because the basis of one her arguments for a win is that she still has the potential to win because both Delegates and super-D’s both have a right to vote any way they want— even if this goes against the popular vote; the will of the people...

Well, it seems with Texas she’s being proven correct somewhat... but the result is not in her favor...

Then regarding Florida and Michigan, she argues let the people speak (even though she signed an agreement regarding those states not counting); and regarding the convention she more than implies that the super-D’s can vote their consciences, regardless of what the will of the people says— Going against the will of the people, in fact, is the very basis of her argument that she can still win...

So, her message here is simple, the people should count, when their votes are for ‘me’; or the delegates’ votes (regardless of what the people say) should count, when the votes are for ‘me’...

Then add to this her repeated ‘lapse of memory’ over the barrage of gunfire she supposedly dodged on that trip she took as a first lady... later proved not as she described...

As for ‘your’ litany of states falling in succession... well, specifically Oregon, which is where I’m from... Obama and Richardson were here together and 12, 000 tickets went away in less than 5 hours or something ridiculous like that (and later they were selling them on craigslist)... Obama will take Oregon, just like Washington...

And as for the PA double digit lead in PA polls... Twenty-somethings and many Thirty-somethings only carry cell phones... They are not being polled... This has been the essence of the surprising numbers in the democratic turnouts... numbers which have literally made precincts order more voting cards...

And who is responsible for generating these numbers... The same candidate whose average donation from contributors is around $109 dollars and (though he’s gotten PAC contributions for senate earlier) has taken ‘no’ federal PAC money for his presidential bid...

Gov. Bill Richardson (a likely and eloquent wise old Obi Wan VP or Secretary of State potential), Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey Jr. (as if to actually punctuate with his endorsement Obama’s recent Wright Speech; or is that the Right Speech), then most notably Vermont's Patrick Leahy... and now the Texas delegates...

So, what is the blowback we see here as a result of her obvious manipulative-ness..? The answer here is simple... If Billary doesn’t take the so-called projected double-digit lead she claims probable in PA and especially if she doesn’t stop the negative campaigning which threatens to take down the entire party with her...

And if Billary can’t quell her feelings of entitlement... her avarice... the Supers are simply gonna do it for her...

The recent spate of endorsements is a warning... and they will become a barrage well before June if Billary can’t take a hint...

Bring on the rain...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #6: That Red Hair In My Beard...


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings regarding race, originally posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts(mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own). For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

This was in response to a re-posting of an article called Obama blew it: What the candidate should have said about race, by Michael Meyers, from March 20, 2008.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------

I like this one, but instead of saying this guy's right and Obama's wrong... I'd have to say it's not either-or; it's a question of context.

What you got here, in comparing both statements about race, is really just another black guy's (transcendent?) opinion compared to another; but it's like apples and oranges. It's a little like that Spike Lee movie, 'Get On the Bus'. Twenty guys; twenty perspectives on what being black means... There is commonality, mostly our shared histories and how (white) society at large effects us, but it's not like a religion. In fact, we were from different regions, tribes and religions when our ancestors were brought here...

When I was in Philly, one place in the U.S. which is probably one of the most racially intense and aware places for blacks I have ever been... The place where Obama gave his famous speech... A place where people are ‘into’ the racial part of their identity like many East Coast cities—Black, but also Jewish, Italian, Irish, etc. A place where racial enclaves were started a hundred years ago or more, and are still often basically the same neighborhoods ... When I was there I once had a conversation with a group of friends and we often made very clear distinctions between race, culture, heritage, etc.

See, you know I’m adopted... this makes me really an outsider even within my adopted black family... My birth mother was from Texas and of Scottish descent (so that’s where those red hairs in my beard came from). My father was black and who knows what else... I was brought up by black adopted parents— well, my dad also had Blackfoot Indian and my mom, Seminole (a tribe I understand also owned black slaves long after emancipation). Just what the hell does that make me..? Even though I grew up kitty corner from friends whose older brother’s were Black Panthers and in a house with an Ebony Magazine subscription, how am to relate to the ‘black’ experience..?

Well, when I try to get a cab in NYC, then I know how to relate to the black experience. When I hear that my brown-skin male cohorts are 10 times more likely to be shot and killed before the age of 26 than yours, more than twice as likely to go to prison, and the females more likely to be single moms in their teen years—you bet your sweet ass I know which box to check when the census taker comes to the door... I know which federal programs will help, and I wanna make sure the correct proportion of federal tax dollars go to those that do... So, yes, politically, there is no doubt I am black!

Yes, I am a human being, but politically, in a political context in this country... I am most certainly black...

That is the context... and that is what Obama’s speech was about, ‘context’... And what this guy wanted..? Well, it wasn’t wrong exactly; it’s just a different speech.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Adama for President
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dalai Lama for President
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Yo Mama for President
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Billary for President

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #5: Marianne Williamson Is Hot!


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------


In particular, this is a response to an essay he posted by playright/Director, David Mamet, whose work I love in almost every category (Just saw Redbelt and it was great!), but whose attitude about other things, well... The essay, titled Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal' was published March 11th, 2008.
---------------


And David Mamet... I love David as a artist, but he’s very much a prime example of exactly the kind of cynicism that’s pervaded the boomer culture. What I was talking about earlier... What’s there not to love about most of his work, and I love “TRUE AND FALSE”; but as for his cynicism...

Let’s just say I hope to God, that in the next life his soul has to be married an entire lifetime to Marianne Williamson...

That Oprah shit’ll fix his ass.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #4: Cylons


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------


In particular, this is a response to the idea which keeps coming up that some conspiracy will destroy Obama in a JFK/RFK-esque like event-- a Jungian projection of a spectre which disturbingly keeps resurfacing.


Even as I re-post this Hillary brought this crap up as a reason she should remain in the race: "My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right..? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California."


Of course, she had to apologize (to somebody)...
---------------


Dear ______,


Gee-whiz... What happened to the guy that just posted that other sappy sentimental real-love-on-Earth posting? Yikes!

I believe it’s like that too, all conspiratorial-corporate and stuff. But the emphasis still has to be on taking action; and not a probability of defeat. The problem with conspiracies (theory or practice) is that they deflate the notion that any progress at all is possible... and that ain’t simply so...

Sooner or later the real monsters rear their ugly heads and it becomes pretty obvious who the lesser of all the available evils are, at least... and it’s pretty obvious who is or ain’t on, say, Cheney’s team.

The problem with most conspiracy theory (playing both sides against the middle and you is the middle) is that it can make you think that all of it is just an exercise in futility... You start thinking, hey, there’s no difference between these guys, so screw it...

And folks, that’s exactly what it’s designed to do... that’s why moneyed interests loves conspiracy theory... It stagnates the idea that any action, or choosing any side, can only lead to the same ol’, same ol failures...

As the saying goes-- Sooner or later, you have to choose sides.

I think Adama said that too...

That’s not a typo; I really do mean Edward James Olmos in Battlestar Galactica...

I really am a believer in Cylons... I mean, wow, Cheney?.. Ann Coulter?.. and that Dana Perino, chick... What up wit dat...?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.