Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Of Paradigms and Spew


I was an infant child in the sixties. Those of you who, like me, were school children or younger at that time have the original and distinct advantage of always existing with an image of Earth— from the vantage point of outer space; and especially from the moon.

Unlike all of our older brethren, even the boomers who’d just preceded us (though we’re often wrongly characterized as amongst that group), our inherent reality about our home is one of Earth without any borders at all. This is a perspective entirely at odds with even the faintest notion of the concept of nation-state. It is a perspective that is different from any generation in western culture which came before. We have never known a reality which dictates confinement to our planet, let alone a single country or even state.

The dilemma is that we have lived amongst those, most that have been in power, who do not possess that inherent perspective.

In Obama, we have elected a candidate for the first time in history who shares this way of perceiving. This, I submit, is the essence of this so-called sea change; this generational shift.

A new era, we say. That’s the phrase, worn out recently from overuse. The victory . . . so overwhelming; so different in so many ways than what any expected as the ultimate result. It wasn’t just the shear numbers of voters but, of course, the younger demographics, plus the reconfiguration of the political party map . . . C’mon, Indiana. . ? North Carolina. . ?

Everyone says that this now shows what’s really possible for America . . . or for a black man, or any other minority in America. Everyone marvels at those qualities, so eloquently illustrated on November 4th, 2008 . . . which make our country such a marvel and, now once again, such a beacon of faith and hopeful idealism made concrete.

We’ve broken another barrier; they say the world over. . .

But . . . I cannot forget the days leading up . . . and neither should you.

It’s been argued for so long, say, against affirmative action, by misinformed if not misleading persons, that we are a free nation now; no longer a nation of double standards for different classes or cultures. Therefore we no longer need special consideration for people who should be able to achieve, to be truly fair, on their own merit; all conditions on the playing field now being proportionately even. I’m afraid that in all of the current commotion we might even confuse the current achievement as proof of this belief.

Despite this race’s magnificent outcome, we’ve all had the opportunity to observe that the terms are anything but even.

His middle name, Hussein, and his foreign born father were used to make him appear more alien.
The place of his elementary school beginnings was made twisted-history in order to make him appear Muslim, and perhaps anti-Semitic. Guilt by association was used to make him appear a terrorist. The candidate could not even break a sweat, let alone get angry, for fear of being perceived as an “angry black man”.

Despite all of this the man and his campaign stayed steady; no wavering, no distraction from the goal, the dream.

It is not because America is a level playing field that he has made it to where he is; it is in spite of the double standards that he has thrived. This is a tremendous testament to the character and discipline of this man and the people around him. The celebrating, the speeches and all of the praise are about this strength and foresight and persistent perseverance.

And there is also another insane irony; that of a tyrannical public in one so-called “liberal” western state, disallowing the individual freedom of people who love each other, from entering into a private contract together. Over here, so much good, so much hope; over there the dam is bursting with the inhumane monstrosity of vindictive, thoughtless fear.

It’s like we’re attempting to gulp down a kind of giant messy hope sandwich. The large and tasty dripping mouthfuls are glorious, but we’re losing a large bit of it out the back as some spews out the other end; and messes in our laps.

There is one comfort I take though, as I watch my 5 year old child sleep, and alternately turn back to the television to take in Obama’s acceptance speech: That my son’s perspective will forever be different from mine; he will never know an America where a man of color could not be President.

Jerry'O

P.S. Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved (Excepting the photos, maybe... My bad, Tee-hee...).

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Rove-ing Evil’s Last Gasp - by Gerald Ollison




There is a scene in the movie Bladerunner which is as telling an image of evil in its death throws as has ever been portrayed.

The replicants, as they are called, are genetically created androids which are indistinguishable from humans in every way excepting one characteristic. They are completely devoid of an empathetic response. They don’t feel anything when other creatures are hurt. This is one apt definition of sociopathological evil.

In the last part of the movie one of the main female replicants, Pris, is shot by the protagonist and hits the ground kicking-n-screaming; but even this display is patently abnormal. It’s a lightning fast repetitive semi-mechanical impersonation of a child’s hate and frustration temper tantrum. It’s Pinocchio on steroids, on his back refusing to die; but it’s mechanical fishlike flopping, kicking and fist pounding betrays the fact that it’s never loved, let alone lived. It’s a frightening display which sends chills down the spine of anyone who has a spine and is paying attention.

The irony is you feel sorry for the creature; but you simultaneously realize there is no way in hell the creature feels the same about you or anything else (no more than a tractor or eggbeater). If you go a step further you also realize the creature believes your sympathetic response is your exploitable weakness. You think, “Oh God, please die, because if you get up there’ll be hell to pay and neither I nor any other sane person has that much currency”!

It’s a stunning display.

Ashley Todd, a McCain Campaign Volunteer is now facing potential charges because she faked a story that she was mugged by a black male at an ATM. She'd originally claimed her money was stolen and the attacker beat, kicked and, when the attacker noticed a sticker showing her support for McCain, carved a letter "B" on her cheek.

Michele Bachmann, Representative for the Sixth District in the State of Minnesota, has called for a press investigation to find out who in congress are pro or anti American, and is now rapidly backpedaling.

Robocalling runs rampant, accusing Obama of being soft on crime.

Both McCain and Palin, and ties to their campaigns, suggesting their competitors are associating with terrorists and is a Muslim (not that there’s anything wrong with that).

Effigies of a hanging black-Obama type; envelopes of white powder sent to democratic campaign offices; and the ole black-men-are-apes joke expressed with Curious George shirts and other paraphernalia; Fires set; shouts of “terrorist” and “kill him” from McCain/Palin campaign crowds, where we must assume the Secret Service is present and watching (but inconspicuously NOT doing their jobs by NOT trouncing on some ass, when this happened).

All of this... also a stunning display. And it doesn’t stop. The mechanical kicking and screaming only repeats... like a child’s temper tantrum.

I am a fan of a particular book by the late M. Scott Peck, M.D. His tomes are laced with Christian theology and psychology. Many of his critics believe the religion and psychiatry are too fluid in his works, often masquerading and otherwise confused with each other, and not in a productive and good way in their opinions. I was raised Christian, but am not certain I would fit that definition by anyone who knows that they are. What I am, is an (amateur) Jungian and as such I am interested in archetypes and anything remotely archetypal and, well, evil (and good too)... Evil and all of its historic personages and manifestations, well, that’s way up there... and this single book by Mister Peck is invoked repeatedly (and often not carefully enough) in relation to his proposed new view and psychological definition of a pathology. Because, in what may be his most compelling work, People of the Lie, this is what he posits:

“Be that as it may, the time is right, I believe, for psychiatry to recognize a distinct new type of personality disorder to encompass those I have named evil. In addition to the abrogation of responsibility that characterizes all personality disorders, this one would specifically be distinguished by:
(a) Consistent destructive, scapegoating behavior, which may often be quite subtle.
(b) Excessive, albeit usually covert, intolerance to criticism and other forms of narcissistic injury.
(c) Pronounced concern with public image and self-image of respectability, contributing to a stability of life-style but also to pretentiousness and denial of hateful feelings or vengeful motives.
(d) Intellectual deviousness, with an increased likelihood of a mild schizophreniclike disturbance of thinking at times of stress.”


He also mentions three other weaknesses: A self-centeredness which betrays a non-understanding of love; the second, since the scientific method is blatantly anti-narcissistic and anti-deception, a disdain and lack of understanding of science. The third quality observed of the evil and indeed, of Satan himself according to Peck, is, “... not only demonic brilliance but also extraordinary demonic stupidity.”

So evil is also, like a child... Well, it’s not too swift.

Many out there believe that this is just an antagonistic campaign strategy meant to incite a radical militant rightwing hateful crowd into a destructive fervor of harmful and perhaps murderous intent towards their critics, and even Obama himself. Some feel it’s a kind of endgame strategy. They know they’re going to lose, so they’re setting up an climate of criticism they can later point to, after an Obama administration shows it’s imperfections by not being instantaneously perfect, and say how they were right all along.

Some people even believe this is about conservatism versus liberalism; I’m with another crowd...

This will represent a generational change. In fact, many of the men who are now fighting this tide of change will actually physically, literally die off during the next 8 or more years of this sea change, as will their policies with them.

And this kicking and screaming. This uncreative, repetitious and mechanical flailing and finger pointing and hateful spewing are simply the best impersonation of a childish temper tantrum that a soulless and shattered android can muster...

It is not exactly the death knell of evil... because evil, or Satan, or an android can’t die...

But it is a reasonable facsimile I can live with.
Jerry'O
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © October 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved (Excepting the photos, maybe... My bad, Tee-hee...).

Friday, September 19, 2008

Deepak Chopra's Palin Effect


Originally posted at the Huffingtonpost.com; this is brilliant!


Obama and the Palin Effect
By Deepak Chopra

Posted September 4, 2008, HuffingtonPost.com


Sometimes politics has the uncanny effect of mirroring the national psyche even when nobody intended to do that. This is perfectly illustrated by the rousing effect that Gov. Sarah Palin had on the Republican convention in Minneapolis this week. On the surface, she outdoes former Vice President Dan Quayle as an unlikely choice, given her negligent parochial expertise in the complex affairs of governing. Her state of Alaska has less than 700,000 residents, which reduces the job of governor to the scale of running one-tenth of New York City. By comparison, Rudy Giuliani is a towering international figure. Palin's pluck has been admired, and her forthrightness, but her real appeal goes deeper.

She is the reverse of Barack Obama, in essence his shadow, deriding his idealism and exhorting people to obey their worst impulses. In psychological terms the shadow is that part of the psyche that hides out of sight, countering our aspirations, virtue, and vision with qualities we are ashamed to face: anger, fear, revenge, violence, selfishness, and suspicion of "the other." For millions of Americans, Obama triggers those feelings, but they don't want to express them. He is calling for us to reach for our higher selves, and frankly, that stirs up hidden reactions of an unsavory kind. (Just to be perfectly clear, I am not making a verbal play out of the fact that Sen. Obama is black. The shadow is a metaphor widely in use before his arrival on the scene.) I recognize that psychological analysis of politics is usually not welcome by the public, but I believe such a perspective can be helpful here to understand Palin's message. In her acceptance speech Gov. Palin sent a rousing call to those who want to celebrate their resistance to change and a higher vision.

Look at what she stands for:--Small town values -- a denial of America's global role, a return to petty, small-minded parochialism.--Ignorance of world affairs -- a repudiation of the need to repair America's image abroad.--Family values -- a code for walling out anybody who makes a claim for social justice. Such strangers, being outside the family, don't need to be heeded.--Rigid stands on guns and abortion -- a scornful repudiation that these issues can be negotiated with those who disagree.--Patriotism -- the usual fallback in a failed war.--"Reform" -- an italicized term, since in addition to cleaning out corruption and excessive spending, one also throws out anyone who doesn't fit your ideology.

Obama's call for higher ideals in politics can't be seen in a vacuum. The shadow is real; it was bound to respond. Not just conservatives possess a shadow -- we all do. So what comes next is a contest between the two forces of progress and inertia. Will the shadow win again, or has its furtive appeal become exhausted? No one can predict. The best thing about Gov. Palin is that she brought this conflict to light, which makes the upcoming debate honest. It would be a shame to elect another Reagan, whose smiling persona was a stalking horse for the reactionary forces that have brought us to the demoralized state we are in. We deserve to see what we are getting, without disguise.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

My Midlife Job Crisis and the Elephant In the Room - by Gerald Ollison

I have been dealing with what, I guess, some call a midlife 'job' crisis. As a result, I've been dealing with a particularly unusual Jungian projection...

It's not like an Anima projection, which draws you towards a certain kind of woman over-n-over again, etc. Nothing so common. It's stranger than that, but just as haunting (and strangely humorous).

It's taken me almost two years to realize it had to do with my midlife crisis and 'Work' with a big 'W'; and I truly believe this has been responsible for keeping me unemployed. It's very bizarre... I described it recently to an old friend in an email, and I want to share it here too. I think this is probably quite common...

I worked for 7 years at a nonprofit classical radio station. I managed the membership and begged for money by mail, worked the membership database and the website... I did good by the station, literally raised millions (one 35 dollar donation at a time) for the station over a few years, and made a decent, modest living too; but the board changed, then the management changed... and we all tried to get along, but the 'law of two feet' was long overdue to be followed, so after many false starts I finally had to conclude it was time for me to leave that organization.

That was almost exactly 2 years ago... We've done a few odd jobs since then, but I've been slowly realizing that this new midlife thang I'm going through is plenty tough and, to me, a little mystical... And it's actually more than contributed to my inability to find to not only 'meaningful work', but any work at all. It has been strange... really...

I won't belabor the issue, but it is a story worth telling with a deep lesson to be learned. Simply put... I've noted I have issues to flesh out. We all have'em, and it's an old story-- around midlife you deal or you're dealt... In Robert Bly's Iron John he talks about katabasis or 'the rat's hole'... Well, I think I'm kinda there. But if I do the reflective work, I hope I understand correctly, and make a decision to go down the rat hole on my own, I'll be spared a more severe arrangement by the gods (an accident, illness, divorce or other tragedy) which will force me to look.

At first, I thought okay, I got skills and fundraising experience. I'll be able to get employment at another nonprofit within a couple of weeks... but that wasn't working, so then I thought it was my age, then my skin color, then the economy or some combination of all of the above... I tweaked and retweaked my résumé... Then after reading one career book after another, after then reading every self-help book and metaphysics tome in the universe, after vocational training to get my insurance sales license (so I can once again do the 'right thing' and just support family), after imploring the very universe itself with-- "The Seeeeeecret!"... after all of that... It began to slowly dawn on me that every time I did a job interview I was being sabotaged...

I don't mean self-sabotage with only verbal slips, etc. I don't mean self-fulfilling prophecy... I mean there was another Jungian something in the room with me...

I refer to it as "the elephant in the room"... but it's a little more than that. It's a Jungian presence made up of some combination of my issues. It's like entering a job interview with an invisible witchdoctor (like in the movie 'Beetlejuice'), who shakes a maraca and proceeds to tweak the results before I've barely started to speak...

The interviewer asks a question and I answer; the maraca shakes and the witchdoctor sings...

The other people in the interview don't exactly see me and my game face (no matter how good it is), or hear me... they see 'It' superimposed over me...It really is like my head is shrinking before their eyes or something!This witchdoctor is, well, really... another (unconscious) me... me and my (unconscious) dreams, spent or still present, my (unconscious) issues, my secret (unconscious) desires, my (unconscious) frustrations and defeats...

But this stuff I need to work on is 'unconscious' so it's particularly difficult to flesh out... Because this unconscious stuff is, by its very (unconscious) nature, unknowable! And there's not a goddamn thing I can do about it... except note it, work with it, work it all eventually and, ever so slowly, out...

There are exercises in books you can do, or which job counselors can help you with, which take you on a paths to finding new work...But a workbook and exercises mightn't work that well. They can tend to be too linear, which is attractive to your conscious mind; the unconscious abhors 'Linear'.

For instance, after being in theater forever, I thought that what I wanted to do (after using various workbooks) was still somehow closely related to something like theater. In particular, I was thinking events work and some kind of work with public speakers and the like... Logical, right? So logical, I even wrote executive summaries for business plans and designed brochures around this idea... I'm pretty sure that's not my path now... Working in a conference center might be an okay day job for me, but I know now that it isn't the expression my unconscious was yearning for.

Also understand, I do appreciate the difference between finding a job (in order to eat, pay the bills, etc.), and a vocation. I appreciate the difference quite well... Well... consciously, I do.
However, I'm not certain the subconscious makes, or is even capable of making, this same distinction...

So, after doing your exercises and workbooks, you might get that simple day job even, only to find it unfathomably unbearable on levels you can't even discern. Only feeling a generalized discomfort, and then eventually being fired or quitting. You will feel like you are going in circles... and you will... until the mystery is eventually truly solved... it actually may be more intuited at first, than discovered...

In fact, even when you're sure you've finally nailed the bugger down and brought it up to the splendid surface; you may find that you mightn't be able to do it for a living, but mostly as a hobby. What's important to know though, is that you've found not your living, but your reason to live; your 'expression'...

And after you've found this expression, and made a proclamation that you will pursue this path finally, then getting that day job gets easier, I think.

This has been my last 2 years. I really don't think this will turn out too bad. I really do believe I'm well on my own way by now, and I have done a lot of the head-work...

But, it has not been an easy 2 years with the witchdoctor.

Jerry'O

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © September 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.(Excepting the photos, maybe... My bad, Tee-hee...)

P.S. In fact, I'll share a book that's been particularly helpful for me, after reading it and working with it several times over (by the public pool where my 5 year old did his summer swim classes). It's called 'Living On Purpose', by Pat A Paulson, Sharon C. Brown and Jo Ann Wolf. It's the only workbook I've found which is nonlinear on purpose. This serves to speak to your subconscious a little better I think. After working with it for awhile I truly realized I was making some breakthroughs.

Friday, May 23, 2008

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #7: Hillary, the De-Energizer Bunny


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
----------------

Originally Posted March 30th (and she's still here...)

In light of recent statements from Clinton that she’ll be in the race ‘til the end, and in the face of odds that make her endorsement as a candidate numerically unlikely, a recent swath of endorsements seem to be sending back to her a reactionary message: First, Obama gets the endorsements from Gov. Bill Richardson, then Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey Jr., then most notably Vermont's Patrick Leahy...

And now on Saturday, Obama wins a majority in a second round, in Texas of all places, of delegates, putting him at 51 to her 49 percent there, and giving him an additional overall delegate lead of 1,858 to her 1,270.

This is more than a little ironic since she actually won the Texas primary; the popular vote...

It’s ironic because the basis of one her arguments for a win is that she still has the potential to win because both Delegates and super-D’s both have a right to vote any way they want— even if this goes against the popular vote; the will of the people...

Well, it seems with Texas she’s being proven correct somewhat... but the result is not in her favor...

Then regarding Florida and Michigan, she argues let the people speak (even though she signed an agreement regarding those states not counting); and regarding the convention she more than implies that the super-D’s can vote their consciences, regardless of what the will of the people says— Going against the will of the people, in fact, is the very basis of her argument that she can still win...

So, her message here is simple, the people should count, when their votes are for ‘me’; or the delegates’ votes (regardless of what the people say) should count, when the votes are for ‘me’...

Then add to this her repeated ‘lapse of memory’ over the barrage of gunfire she supposedly dodged on that trip she took as a first lady... later proved not as she described...

As for ‘your’ litany of states falling in succession... well, specifically Oregon, which is where I’m from... Obama and Richardson were here together and 12, 000 tickets went away in less than 5 hours or something ridiculous like that (and later they were selling them on craigslist)... Obama will take Oregon, just like Washington...

And as for the PA double digit lead in PA polls... Twenty-somethings and many Thirty-somethings only carry cell phones... They are not being polled... This has been the essence of the surprising numbers in the democratic turnouts... numbers which have literally made precincts order more voting cards...

And who is responsible for generating these numbers... The same candidate whose average donation from contributors is around $109 dollars and (though he’s gotten PAC contributions for senate earlier) has taken ‘no’ federal PAC money for his presidential bid...

Gov. Bill Richardson (a likely and eloquent wise old Obi Wan VP or Secretary of State potential), Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey Jr. (as if to actually punctuate with his endorsement Obama’s recent Wright Speech; or is that the Right Speech), then most notably Vermont's Patrick Leahy... and now the Texas delegates...

So, what is the blowback we see here as a result of her obvious manipulative-ness..? The answer here is simple... If Billary doesn’t take the so-called projected double-digit lead she claims probable in PA and especially if she doesn’t stop the negative campaigning which threatens to take down the entire party with her...

And if Billary can’t quell her feelings of entitlement... her avarice... the Supers are simply gonna do it for her...

The recent spate of endorsements is a warning... and they will become a barrage well before June if Billary can’t take a hint...

Bring on the rain...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #6: That Red Hair In My Beard...


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings regarding race, originally posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts(mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own). For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

This was in response to a re-posting of an article called Obama blew it: What the candidate should have said about race, by Michael Meyers, from March 20, 2008.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------

I like this one, but instead of saying this guy's right and Obama's wrong... I'd have to say it's not either-or; it's a question of context.

What you got here, in comparing both statements about race, is really just another black guy's (transcendent?) opinion compared to another; but it's like apples and oranges. It's a little like that Spike Lee movie, 'Get On the Bus'. Twenty guys; twenty perspectives on what being black means... There is commonality, mostly our shared histories and how (white) society at large effects us, but it's not like a religion. In fact, we were from different regions, tribes and religions when our ancestors were brought here...

When I was in Philly, one place in the U.S. which is probably one of the most racially intense and aware places for blacks I have ever been... The place where Obama gave his famous speech... A place where people are ‘into’ the racial part of their identity like many East Coast cities—Black, but also Jewish, Italian, Irish, etc. A place where racial enclaves were started a hundred years ago or more, and are still often basically the same neighborhoods ... When I was there I once had a conversation with a group of friends and we often made very clear distinctions between race, culture, heritage, etc.

See, you know I’m adopted... this makes me really an outsider even within my adopted black family... My birth mother was from Texas and of Scottish descent (so that’s where those red hairs in my beard came from). My father was black and who knows what else... I was brought up by black adopted parents— well, my dad also had Blackfoot Indian and my mom, Seminole (a tribe I understand also owned black slaves long after emancipation). Just what the hell does that make me..? Even though I grew up kitty corner from friends whose older brother’s were Black Panthers and in a house with an Ebony Magazine subscription, how am to relate to the ‘black’ experience..?

Well, when I try to get a cab in NYC, then I know how to relate to the black experience. When I hear that my brown-skin male cohorts are 10 times more likely to be shot and killed before the age of 26 than yours, more than twice as likely to go to prison, and the females more likely to be single moms in their teen years—you bet your sweet ass I know which box to check when the census taker comes to the door... I know which federal programs will help, and I wanna make sure the correct proportion of federal tax dollars go to those that do... So, yes, politically, there is no doubt I am black!

Yes, I am a human being, but politically, in a political context in this country... I am most certainly black...

That is the context... and that is what Obama’s speech was about, ‘context’... And what this guy wanted..? Well, it wasn’t wrong exactly; it’s just a different speech.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Adama for President
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dalai Lama for President
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Yo Mama for President
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Billary for President

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #5: Marianne Williamson Is Hot!


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------


In particular, this is a response to an essay he posted by playright/Director, David Mamet, whose work I love in almost every category (Just saw Redbelt and it was great!), but whose attitude about other things, well... The essay, titled Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal' was published March 11th, 2008.
---------------


And David Mamet... I love David as a artist, but he’s very much a prime example of exactly the kind of cynicism that’s pervaded the boomer culture. What I was talking about earlier... What’s there not to love about most of his work, and I love “TRUE AND FALSE”; but as for his cynicism...

Let’s just say I hope to God, that in the next life his soul has to be married an entire lifetime to Marianne Williamson...

That Oprah shit’ll fix his ass.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #4: Cylons


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------


In particular, this is a response to the idea which keeps coming up that some conspiracy will destroy Obama in a JFK/RFK-esque like event-- a Jungian projection of a spectre which disturbingly keeps resurfacing.


Even as I re-post this Hillary brought this crap up as a reason she should remain in the race: "My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right..? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California."


Of course, she had to apologize (to somebody)...
---------------


Dear ______,


Gee-whiz... What happened to the guy that just posted that other sappy sentimental real-love-on-Earth posting? Yikes!

I believe it’s like that too, all conspiratorial-corporate and stuff. But the emphasis still has to be on taking action; and not a probability of defeat. The problem with conspiracies (theory or practice) is that they deflate the notion that any progress at all is possible... and that ain’t simply so...

Sooner or later the real monsters rear their ugly heads and it becomes pretty obvious who the lesser of all the available evils are, at least... and it’s pretty obvious who is or ain’t on, say, Cheney’s team.

The problem with most conspiracy theory (playing both sides against the middle and you is the middle) is that it can make you think that all of it is just an exercise in futility... You start thinking, hey, there’s no difference between these guys, so screw it...

And folks, that’s exactly what it’s designed to do... that’s why moneyed interests loves conspiracy theory... It stagnates the idea that any action, or choosing any side, can only lead to the same ol’, same ol failures...

As the saying goes-- Sooner or later, you have to choose sides.

I think Adama said that too...

That’s not a typo; I really do mean Edward James Olmos in Battlestar Galactica...

I really am a believer in Cylons... I mean, wow, Cheney?.. Ann Coulter?.. and that Dana Perino, chick... What up wit dat...?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #3: The Pot Calling the Kettle... Wha..?

Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings regarding race, originally posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts(mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

For a look at Barack’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------

First this:

Don Wycliff, editor of the Chicago Tribune, reviewed Steele's book and disagreed with his analysis of Barack noting that:

"[as] I read his essay, I found myself thinking that Steele was trapped in a time warp, that his knowledge of the currents of thought and attitude among black people stopped sometime around 1990. Less charitably, I found myself thinking that the egregious Al Sharpton is not the only one with an investment in a static view of American race relations....It apparently never occurs to Steele that for a man a generation younger than himself the terms of blackness might be different, that the “totalitarian” demands he [Steele] encountered in the ’60s might no longer prevail, that Barack Obama’s mixed-race experience might actually be different than Shelby Steele’s."

My own bit:

Let’s see... Bargaining..? Trade-offs..? Relieving white guilt..? Wants to ‘be black’..? Wait! You’re calling Obama an Oreo!!!

Oh, God!!! Is this a tired old accusation, or what?... The above review is dead on! Not Shelby... Basically, Shelby Steele’s take is just a revamped version of the ol’ uncle Tom Oreo name callin’ thang... That’s it. For all his intellectualizing and pseudo psychological neo Freud-o babble about ‘trade-offs’, it just boils down one black guy calling another black guy a house nigga’... and it’s so, so tired and boring... He reminds me of the children I grew up with (yes, a father remembers...), except he’s still angry... Whatever...

Steele talks about Barack’s charisma as if it’s entirely a contrivance. In fact, lots of people who want Obama to just “go away already!”, talk like that; like it’s all an image he’s somehow positioned himself in, to manipulate... This isn’t that surprising because hey, that’s what campaigns and politics is all about, right? Show business, right; focus groups and PR and positioning and shit? But we are all aware of this by now... And we’re not under some funky contextual spell, and Barack isn’t stirring toads into a magic iron urn and mumbling spells of hypnotic delights to delusional wide-eyed blind optimists, towards which he’s positioned himself as some savior.

Interesting note: Charisma is based on the word charism... Originally, is was a term used by monks to describe a quality given to a person by god, in order to validate that person’s presence in a place.

Doesn’t that just piss off the gatekeepers and how!

Yeah, admittedly, some of what is happening is about the context which Barack is positioned in. But he didn’t do it himself. He may be providing Jungian hooks on which we are hanging all kinds of archetypes... None of them, from his direct causation or manipulation. But he is a famous young black politician running for president in the United States, for chrissake!

Now, if he were an eloquent and poetic black boxer protesting the war, it wouldn’t be so surprising... Well, not these days anyway...

So, why should all that archetype hanging surprise us? Sheesh...

This doesn’t make him manipulative, psychologically strange, nor the new hope to his supporters... it just means that on (whatever truthful and real) hook he’s got, those archetypes, today anyway, hang quite well...

Maybe, just maybe his charisma is because, within today’s context, he may be the right person (when compared to the current alternatives) to help us heal some of this pessimism, masquerading as realism.

Maybe this exchange on your blog is all it’s all about...

But does it really have to sink to some house nigga thang..?

My name is Barack Obama...

Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #2: MIddle East Meets 'West' (A Letter)

Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings regarding race, originally posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts. One or two of his posts were strongly negative, pro-Zionist takes on the Senator (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

I have heard that some rightwing extreme groups are spreading outright lies in a whisper campaign about Barack’s Israel policy positions and this is disturbing if true. For a look at Barak’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit http://www.barackobama.com/.

For info regarding his beliefs and activity history specific to Israel I suggest downloading the PDF file on his
Foreign Policy Page at his site here>>.

Also, more info is on his fact pages here>>


I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.
---------------



Hi, _______—

I do so understand your response— more than you may know.

There is a marvelous chapter in Cornel West’s ‘Race Matters’ on Black-Jewish relations which describes the ongoing dialog (like our own bit here) impeccably. I’m gonna do one of those excerpt thingies-- Please bare with:

“Without a sympathetic understanding of the deep historic sources of Jewish fears and anxieties about group survival, blacks will not grasp the visceral attachment of most Jews to Israel. Similarly, without a candid acknowledgement of blacks’ status as permanent underdogs in American society, Jews will not comprehend what the symbolic predicament and literal plight of Palestinians in Israel means to blacks...”

Later, same chapter...

“My fundamental premise is that the black freedom struggle is a major buffer between the David Dukes of America and the hope for a future in which we can begin to take justice and freedom for all seriously. Black anti-Semitism— along with its concomitant xenophobias, such as patriarchal and homophobic prejudices— weakens this buffer. In the process, it plays into the hands of the old-style racists, who appeal to the worst of our fellow citizens amid the silent depression that plagues the majority of Americans...”

Later, same paragraph...

“And without principled opposition to the xenophobias from above and below, these desperate channels will produce a cold-hearted and mean spirited America no longer worth fighting for or living in.”

This is simply a candid description of a Platonic dialectic— of a ‘process’. Much like Barack’s speech today pegged in so many ways. I have said over and over to my self and to others that life is not a ‘zero sum game’ (the exact words I heard in his speech today). One need not necessarily lose for the other, or all, to win. This is an old concept of win or lose, black or white... It’s like, the world is still flat and the center of the universe, ya know...

Those who would change our dialectic into a debate or argument want us to see it that way... I refuse to see life in that way; or there’s simply no reason to hope for the future. Real life has lots of gray, complexity and nuance...

And complexity? We can overcome this... Adult humans can do complexity well when we try... There can be peaceful solutions... and we cannot be sucked into the fears of our ancestors, nor allow rhetorical manipulation by today’s special interests that fear they’ll ‘lose’...

We are better for our progenitors’ struggles; not less than, otherwise we dishonor their memory, their souls (let alone our genes).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

The Dalai ‘Bama Letters #1: Are You Experienced..?


Originally, the following was in response to a close, and mostly liberal, friend’s series of anti-Obama postings regarding race, posted in March of 2008 or thereabouts. One or two of his posts were strongly negative, pro-Zionist takes on the Senator (mostly all posts were copies of articles my friend found elsewhere, and were not my friend’s own).

I have heard that some rightwing extreme groups are spreading outright lies in a whisper campaign about Barack’s Israel policy positions and this is disturbing if true. For a look at Barak’s actual policies on anything (instead of propaganda) please simply visit
http://www.barackobama.com/.

For info regarding his beliefs and activity history specific to Israel I suggest downloading the PDF file on his
Foreign Policy Page at his site here>>.

Also, more info is on his fact pages here>>

I may have revised some small bits, but the spirit remains.


Hi, _______-- Jerry'O again... I just listened to the Barack speech he gave in Philly today... It is a masterpiece.

I was for Obama since the beginning. When I hear the various arguments going back and forth, I keep coming back to 2 basic ideas... feelings really, more than thoughts...

Number 'One') Obama is from the original 'Generation X'... Those of us at the tail end of the baby boom, the 'bust-ing' part; by some people’s measurements those born between 1958 and 1964, roughly.

I think this observation matters more regarding the perspective which his campaign is viewed through, than his race. It is why I think his campaign appeals to the young so much. The late Bill Strauss (co-founder of the Capitol Steps, that Bill Strauss) co-wrote a series of books about the world’s historic and generational peculiarities and divides, and it’s too bad he’s dead because I really wonder how he’d view Obama’s candidacy through this prism.

To clarify, here’s a quote of a description I found on the net of his book ‘13th Gen’ (I apologize, I can’t find my own copy here in the house):

“It's "13er" Nancy Smith's "...generation after. Born after 1960, after you, after it all happened." It's those born after the Boom, but before the Babies-on-Board 1980s, between 1961 and 1981 (I was born in 1977). It's those alternately tagged "Generation X," "Baby Busters," "Computer Babies," the "New Lost," "Nowhere," "Boomerang," or "MTV" generation. It's the generation with a terminally bad image, one no spin doctor press agent would have even tried to manage... Everyone hears about sagging test scores, rising violence, sexually transmitted diseases, the declining job market and the fact that this generation will be less well off than those which came before...”

We of this bust period were the ones who arrived late to the Summer of Love, after eating and buying all the philosophy and pabulum, and ready to party...

Only, oops! Reagan’s in office and, hey, where did all my older brothers and sisters go..?

We are the ones who’ve been dubbed the original ‘Slackers’. We’ve been largely the service industry for those others: Waiters, then office administrators and other mercenary service society to those who came before, and more than a little disillusioned by it... It’s argued we’re viewed largely with confusion, distrust and even as a threat by the boomers before us... Because, hey, we’re pissed, and why shouldn’t we be..?

Think you’re gonna get that job after the boss retires..? Sorry, didn’t you hear they’re raising the retirement age to 75..? Didn’t get that memo..? Oops, my bad... Well, you know, we can’t go anywhere just yet because we’re all so healthy and pumped up from yoga... And it’s like, our spokesman, Dennis Hopper says in the Ameriprise commercial, “We’re not going out to pasture!”, because hey, we don’t really have as much money saved for retirement as we need (because we’ve been blowin’ it all on those little blue pills and Botox injections).

Obama will not be trusted, and not because of race really, and not because of the so-called bad guys he (more than any other politician we know) associates with; but because he’s, get this, like those other Slackers... inexperienced... can you hear Jimi Hendrix..? Are you experienced, Obama..? Are you ‘experienced’?

Yeah, give it to the yuppie; not the puppy...

That’s just Number ‘One’...

Number ‘Two’) Listen to his Philly speech... Try not to cry... not because he’s somehow manipulating you... but because of the truth of it...

Hillary is sincere with her tears, and I do believe they come from her heart. She believes with all her heart in her ideals and will fight to the death to defend them,

But Obama brings the tears from you, because he has resonated more than once with a truth many feel in their own hearts.

People have tried to nail him to the wall with his imperfections as a man or politician with facts dug up from here or there...

But he’s not choosing, for the most part, to fight with facts... He’s choosing, like other imperfect but truly inspired leaders before him, to align himself with truth... that inner stuff... as long as he takes the high road the facts thrown at him will only show what we already know— that he’s just a man... but it won’t change the truth he’s aligning with...

The truth is a funny thing-- You can throw facts at it, you can shoot it, you can call it names, you can say it’s inadequate, dysfunctional, you can associate it with as many bad things and people as you want, but it will only be the man who is flawed, who dies or loses an election; not the truth he aligns himself with...

For better or for worse, I feel in my heart of hearts that this man is honestly attempting to take this high road... to align himself with the truth...

That’s why this has become a ‘movement’. This isn’t at the level of rhetoric anymore...

This is part 2 maybe, of what the boomers started years ago... and it’s more than a little ironic that they couldn’t see it coming...

The party is finally just getting started.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2008 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

NewMyth #1: Experiences with the Sacred - by Gerald Ollison


Originally a response to a curious convenience store security video of a purported 'ghost'. This was posted on Tony Forkush's blog Stop This Noise in My Head, on November 25th, 2007 as Gerald Ollison's Ghost in the Machine.

Firstly, I don't have the luxury of nonbelief. I've had one (fucking profound) ufo sighting, various psychic flashes and several so-called ghost experiences (one notable experience which left physical traces I showed a friend afterward, and another which took place with another witness present).

I'm not defending this particular video. I wasn't there and I dunno. But when I hear people say they don't believe I feel a responsibility to chime in. I won't try to convert you; but I feel we are really doing ourselves and our collective experience of reality a disservice, if we don't at least cop to some of this mystery which is here.

I have to admit, because I've experienced some pretty bizarre stuff first hand, that I might be more gullible than the next guy because I'm, by default, willing to entertain the possibility more than many. Also though, if you have had these kinds of experiences it pretty much changes you in other ways. First, you are overwhelmed. At this point, you either deny it (because you need to live with a solid definition of things); or it moves you, inspires you, in some way. . . You are aware of the depth of the mystery of it all, because you have been touched directly by it. If you are stable, you don't so much as loose your footing as become comfortable with balancing amidst the uneasiness of it; and, if you are inquisitive at all, you will attempt to study it. You won't find any answers, but you'll see that there are plenty more experiencers out there who are attempting to ask more questions, and who aren't afraid of being ridiculed for showing their investigative results.

Specifically, Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) has been a pastime since the spiritualism of the early 1900s. Alexander Graham Bell was one of its most famous proponents. To this day, people go into graveyards, old prisons and condemned insane asylums with their tape recorders on, and they record (what seems to be) nothing for hours... but later, when they play the tapes back, they've recorded often eerily clear voices speaking and shouting all kinds of craziness. And since security cameras have become prolific, ghost video recordings have also become commonplace. Google EVP and you'll find many of these recordings online.

Generally, our culture chooses, for the most part, to abide by beliefs from within the context of a deductive, scientific perspective. We do live in a society of choices, so this is not the only context or perspective available to us, by any means. We are surrounded by churches and other alternative philosophical institutions, but livability with each other in our western North American society (and now the world) demands a way to reconcile our religious and philosophical pluralism. We seem to use science as a kind of uneasy, but mostly safe mediator; a peaceful neutral alternative to the philosophical differences which otherwise divide us. The proof in science is materialistic. It comforts us that we can touch it, show it to each other.

But ironically, our materialistic Newtonian Clockwork view of the world is actually a century out of date. It's no more than a mythical doctrine itself. Decades old experiments in quantum physics have already explained that we are either particles or waves, depending on what we expect to find when we go looking; and that we are all connected through the subatomic fact of quantum entanglement. In other words, the universe is what we perceive and expect it to be, and you and me and everything are literally one-and-the-same: We really are all One... and isn't this how many define God?

The result? While previous millennia may be accused of not having the correct (scientific) explanations behind their collective experience, we of the post-enlightenment era may be the first, because of our deference to materialistic science, to deny our collective experience altogether.

I'm not making an argument to be gullible (like me). I am making a case, for everyone I know and our society at large, to become less afraid I guess, and to become more openly accepting of, what I have come to call, experiences with the sacred...

And before you take that word 'sacred' and think I'm going all new agey on you-- believe me, nothing could be farther from the truth. I don't really consider myself of that ilk... at the same time, because of the scale, the magnitude, the bigness, of the possible truths these experiences infer-- and as a witness myself, what else can I call it?

And I'm not alone... Not nearly...

I know people don't like polls. I know, with some people they just don't trust them 'cause they think they're slanted, or it's just, like, Zzzzzzzzzzzz-snoozetime... But the actual population numbers these particular polls suggest have always floored me, and I know a lot of people don't know about these so I gotta bring this up. It really is going somewhere, so please bear with. I'll keep it short.

Firstly, I'm gonna note both UFO and ghost polls, because I'm not certain myself how separate the events are or how they divide up (and It's not widely known, but lots of people who are UFO experiencers also see their deceased acquaintances). Also, regarding mental illness (some of you think this is a mental issue). I'm just gonna throw this out there: It is determined that schizophrenia affects roughly one percent of the population; numbers for depression are higher, around nine percent, if I recall.

From a 2007 Associated Press-Ipsos Poll-- 23 Percent (that's roughly a quarter of everyone you know) either say they have actually seen a ghost or believe they have been in one's presence. Most likely candidates for such visits include single people, Roman Catholics and those who 'never' attend religious services. More who say they're liberals (31 percent), compared to those who consider themselves conservatives (18 percent) report actually seeing a specter.

In August 1997, in a survey conducted by independent researchers in five Canadian cities in British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec, the independent research consortium has found that 9.6% of all Canadians believe they have seen UFOs. This translates into nearly 3 million people who said they were UFO witnesses.

The present US population I think is approximately 301,139,947, so the following numbers I insert below are those you'd get if you extend the poll numbers throughout the actual population.

Dig this, from a September 2002 Roper Poll:

One in seven Americans say that they or someone they know has had at least one "close encounter" of the "First," "Second," or "Third" kind. That's 43,019,992.

One in five Americans (60,227,989) in general say they believe that humans have already interacted with extraterrestrial life; 57 percent of those (34,329,954) believe that abductions have taken place... And of those who believe in abductions..?

One-third of those who believe in abductions-- 11,328,884-- claim to have experienced, or know someone who experienced, a Close Encounter of their own.

Let's just for the hell of it, waaaaaay overcompensate, and let's do the incredibly inequitable thing, and minus our 3,011,399 schizophrenics from the number above and you get: 8,317,485 (02.76 percent) people in the US who we know are 'not' schizophrenic, who say they personally, or know someone who says they have personally, experienced a close encounter of their own.

That's like three percent of everyone you know.

Three percent of everyone you know, 3 out of every 100 persons you pass by when walking on the street, about the same size as the population of Los Angeles, who are not sick with dopamine imbalances, and who are probably trustworthy in about a thousand other ways that you know-- knows someone or has had, and may continue to have on a regular basis-- an experience with sacred.

Yet we deny it as a society. It's a cultural suppression of the wildest kind. It's an innate birthright of our identities as humans for all we know, and we are not allowed to share it, or feel we can acknowledge it in any meaningful way.

No wonder we have gone from spiritual adepts, to inepts. No wonder we're all so neurotic-psychotic.

These experiences may not be real the way we commonly accept, but this is not to say that they aren't as physical as the nose on your face. These experiences are often observed by multiple witnesses. It is not widely known that the 'revolving and falling sun' in Fatima was not only witnessed by 70,000 people in the vicinity of Cova da Iria, but also by others in the surrounding area of over 20 to 30 miles! These events often leave physical traces, though the collective wisdom won't often acknowledge this either.

They are part of our collective so-called myths, religions, fairy tales and legends. These experiences directly mark the bodies and the minds of the experiencers themselves, and indirectly mark us all, whether you choose to acknowledge it as real or not.

Happy Holy Days.
Jerry'O
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copyright © November 2007 by Gerald Ollison. All rights reserved.